January 21, 2005
Judge Joan
I have been asked to sit on the Academic Progress Committee (APC) as the student representative again. This means that when I come back from Tasmania, I get to listen to excluded engineering students pleading to be allowed back into the course. The Faculty secretary sounded so relieved to find a volunteer for this three day chore. They think I’m doing them a favour but honestly, I really enjoy listening to student tragedies and sob stories.
At my uni, an engineering student is automatically excluded if he or she fails at least 50% of their subjects or fails a subject three times. The student is given the chance to appeal to the APC, bringing forth documentation, sorrowful eyes and trembling lips to prove their case.
I first sat on the APC last year. I don’t know how I was chosen. I’m part of a panel of three people, including Heads of Departments and the Dean of Engineering. You may be surprised to hear this, but the Committee is quite soft. We accept almost any story that sounds reasonable and can be substantiated. Last year, I listened to cases involving:
- A rural student who was too poor to afford a computer or printer;
- An international student from China who became a single mother and had to give up her baby;
- A student with a suicidal father;
- A student who found out he was adopted and spent the year searching for his birth mother (he found her in Turkey); and
- A final year student who had failed the very last subject he needed to graduate.
And then there were some students who said, “Yeah, sorry, I failed. I feel really bad. I’ll do better next time.” No other justifications.
Our exclusion rate is about one in five, so if you appeal, your chances of being allowed back in are quite good. Our rules of thumb are:
- Don’t exclude first years.
- Allow final year students to finish their degree.
- Be softer on first time offenders. Exclude anyone showing up for the second time.
- If their academic record shows they are barely passing, uphold their exclusion. They shouldn’t waste their time in a course obviously not suited to them.
- Think very carefully before excluding international students. They’ve spent a lot of money on this degree. (Believe it or not, we care about the value of money to them, rather than the money they are paying the university.)
From sitting on this panel, I can tell which of the engineering disciplines are the most difficult. There are hardly ever any civil or environmental engineers. Most flunking students come from mechanical or electrical engineering.
Sometimes, I look at all these marginal students and cringe. At the rate they’re bumbling along, most of them will graduate eventually. Who would want to hire these people, with their academic records littered with 45s, 52s and even zeroes? It seems like they pass just by chance. How can the uni award the Bachelor of Engineering to these half-baked students?
I sometimes think that by letting these students graduate, I damage the reputation of my own degree.
I’m off to Tasmania for a week. Blog you all soon!





