Archive for February, 2007

 

February 27, 2007

The sense of temporary

In Melbourne, home has always been with my family. I’ve never been without a ‘base’. But now, as an international student, I’ve learned a bit about what it feels like to be groundless. There is a sense of temporariness. Every time I want to buy something, I think about how I’m going to get it back to Melbourne or if I would sell it when I leave. I make do with imperfect systems, like limited banking abilities. I don’t file my paperwork properly. I have fewer haircuts. I’ve put my dancing on hold. Everything is on pause.

The worst of it has been my living space. My room was like a hostel room: bare, characterless, functional. Why spend the money and time, just to take it all down when I leave in six months? It’s quite a rational line of thought, isn’t it? But I underestimated the psychological discomfort of living no man’s land.

I’ve visited other people’s rooms. They have flags, posters, drapes, ornaments, rugs… The decorated rooms felt more home-like. Someone lived there.

On the weekend, I chose 45 of my favourite photos from my time in Cambridge so far and got them printed through Photobox. The photos arrived on Monday and at 1 AM, I was still happily sticking photos all over the walls of my room with Blu Tack. It’s made a huge difference. I feel like my room is a home now.

Comments (5)

 

February 25, 2007

The Oming Crossroads: Choices

Previously –

Oming resources were poured into the race to adapt the blue fire war weapon for the battle to replenish to the sky’s carbon. It made some Oming uneasy.

‘The ancestor fuel and fire is dangerous,’ was the warning. ‘And it will run out eventually. This is no solution… What if something goes wrong?’

‘Nothing will go wrong,’ the technologists and leaders replied as they lit the black fuel.

There was one accident. And in the densely layered cities, fire easily blazed pathways from Oming to Oming. There was no longer any need for twenty Lower Omings to sacrifice themselves to spread fire. Without help, the fire itself consumed millions.

After that, those that grieved most joined the dissenters to call for the blue fire to be buried under the mountains, as it once was. The technologists also grieved but they knew what had gone wrong and they knew how it could be fixed. The technology could be made safe.

The technologists did their work well. There were no other major accidents.

Indeed, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air did start to rise. At the same time, the constantly burning fuel spat out soot, which was carried by the winds and coated Oming leaves. Lifespans in the worst affected fields were shorter. Oming died younger, as they struggled to shake off the black carbon that didn’t make it to the air. Sometimes, rain would wash the soot away but the rain also pitted wood with acid.

The blue fire was fed for hundreds of years, stabilising carbon dioxide in the air. It could have been called a success but the price of a warmer planet was soot and acid damage to previously productive fields. The planet now supported billions of Omings in a poorer state than when it supported millions.

The coal ran out.

The cooling restarted.

As the planet plunged towards an age of frost, billions of cold-stressed Oming drew on the planet’s reserves of nutrients and thermal heat. But overcrowding in the cities meant that fields were being sucked dry before the natural cycle of death, decay and weathering could replace the soil. Within a generation, fields near the Poles and on the winter islands were desolate stands of Oming stumps.

Those that could retreated to the equator. However, even the equatorial cities had been impoverished by the cooling. With more refugees drawing on the soil’s nutrient reserves, Oming leaders realised that even the carrying capacity of the rich equator could be exceeded.

They were beyond the tipping point. The lesson was learned too late. Every time technology was used to extend the planet’s limits, they encountered another limit. The Oming could have chosen to battle layer after layer after layer of limits, or they could have pulled back to live within them. The survivors lived to regret the choice that was made.

Leave a Comment

 

February 24, 2007

Postcards from the Cotswolds

The Cotswolds is an AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) in the south of England. It’s full of typically English picturesque villages. How picturesque? See for yourself. I took these photos last weekend, when Damjan, Maja, Kreso and I rented a car to go dancing and exploring.

Burford is a beautiful English village, which has been taken over by tourist-loaded cars.

If you can’t get to London to see the real thing, Burford School comes to the rescue! It’s kind of like Microsoft Office: Student Edition.

Burford has a few strange things. There are green crosses like these on many of the walls…

And giant green ‘salt’ boxes on the sidewalks.

A pot plant.

The people living in this house must not have been into pot plants.

Like the good souls that we are, we immediately walked towards the church.

There are a lot of churches in England. They’re often the most beautiful buildings.

I like taking photos in graveyards here in England. There’s lots of moss.


We trespassed on private property. This, in England, is called ‘rambling’. It’s a national past-time.

Rambling is muddy business. Damjan and Kreso found a large stick to scrape off the clods of mud. Can you tell Damjan likes to dance?

Comments (3)

 

February 21, 2007

Mr or Ms Not-quite-right

This is interesting: All Men Are Liars describes ‘the 80 per cent relationship‘.

I think you just need to be careful about the criteria you put on your scorecard. There are important criteria. For me, it’s intelligence, sense of humour, generosity… For others, it might be religion, interests, independence, attractiveness…

I do believe that people are often too picky. Their scorecards are loaded with things that don’t matter or are unrealistic. Perhaps no one should settle for 80 per cent, but if someone is consistently finding 60 and 80 percenters, then maybe he or she needs to look at his or her scorecard.

Comments (5)

 

February 21, 2007

Rusty brain

“I bought a bike lock a few months ago,” I announced. “Not here, somewhere else. Anyway, it rusted shut yesterday. Could you sell me a lock that won’t do that?”

The bike store man blinked. “I don’t know any lock that won’t do that. Things rust. If you don’t want something to rust, you have to oil it.”

“Oh…….” I was properly chastised. “Erm. What kind of oil?”

“Any lubricant for moving parts,” he explained, slowly, for all the stupid people in the room.

“Do you, ah, sell oil here?”

“Yes.” He pointed to a large white plastic bottle. “It’s £2.”

“Well, I’ll have one of those.”

He took the bottle off the shelf and my £2 coin to the cash register. I hovered around uselessly.

“Would you like me to open it for you?” he offered kindly.

“Ah, thanks.”

He snipped off the lid and handed it over to me. “Careful,” he cautioned. “The bottle is open now.”

Such kindness to the stupid children of Cambridge University.

Comments (1)

 

February 19, 2007

Joan pokes fun of people who aren’t here to defend themselves

I went to the TLC Ball at Winchester Guildhall 2007 on Saturday night. There were three rooms, one each for salsa, swing and Argentine tango. Besides feeling terrified about asking people to dance and feeling guilty about being scared, I quite enjoyed the ball (I used to be more confident but I haven’t danced in a while).

But I do need to say this about the ball: I have never seen so many badly dressed women in my life. Everything was too tight and too shiny. Cleavage threatened to escape their alotted space. There were dress and trousers (!) slits in the wrong places. One girl I’m thinking of would have looked been fine — if only she had stopped before wrapping her grandmother’s aquamarine woollen shawl around her waist.

People say that the English have little sense of style. Was it any worse than I’ve seen in Australia? It must have been. I’m not much of a fashion watcher so I wouldn’t have noticed unless there was evidence of extraordinary bad taste.

To be honest, it might have been an ‘older women at a dance party’ phenomenon and my pattern observations were skewed by a few badly dressed young women.

Comments (5)

 

February 19, 2007

CheatNeutral — a funny but limited analogy

My friend, Dan M, sent me a very funny link. CheatNeutral pokes fun at the carbon offset industry by comparing it to people paying to offset their cheating.

I wrote back to Dan. This below is a slightly edited version of what I sent.

This is very funny. I’ve sent it onwards to five of my classmates. We’re working with an architecture firm on the legal/technical/social/economic/environmental management of carbon offset projects for renewables in building projects around the world.

The analogy between carbon offset and cheat offset is a tad questionable, though. Cheat offsetting is clearly a ridiculous concept and it’s meant to highlight the problems with carbon offsetting, namely that relying on offsetting does not provide incentives for reducing the source of the problem. However, some of the ‘outrage’ from cheat offsetting is that cheating is a moral issue. More and more, pollution has become a moral issue (‘It’s evil or irresponsible to pollute at any level’) but the morality of pollution is by no means universally accepted.

There are still large sectors of society that believes that there may be an optimal level of pollution and appropriate compensation for pollution. This is completely different to, say, if a Chief of Police comes out and says that their crime fighting budget has been allocated based on a risk assessment that has determined the optimal number of child molestations. That’s because child molestations (and cheating) are moral issues.

It’s kind of like the difference between the Australian government views drug use (‘Just say no’) and the Netherlands treatment of drug use as a health and social problem. Or the way medical researchers say that the costs of some animal suffering are justified by the benefits from testing on animals, while to animal rights activists, there is no ‘optimal’ amount of animal suffering.

So the key difference between carbon offsetting and cheat offsetting is that carbon offsetting can work. It does suck carbon out of the air. It could help mitigate global warming.

(Note that in Europe and other places, carbon offset projects include replacing fossil fuels with renewables or more efficient appliances. It doesn’t just cover sequestration by growing trees or pumping CO2 into the ground).

Of course, we can’t rely on carbon offsetting because the fundamental problem is that we live in a world that encourages (even mandates) increasing consumption and growth. Even if we were to eliminate CO2 emissions, current CO2 generating activities have other environmental impacts that cause problems, like resource depletion, toxic pollution, habitat destruction and so on. Offsetting can’t address these problems. Even eco-efficiency can’t address these problems (see Jevons Paradox). I have come to believe that cold nuclear fusion (clean limitless energy) will just allow us to destroy the earth even faster.

To me, it would have been more correct to have compared carbon offsetting with, say, a reliance on chemotherapy. Chemotherapy doesn’t generally have a moral dimension. It’s effective in many situations but there are plenty of negative side effects — and surely it is ‘better’ to address cancer triggers.

Of course, that wouldn’t have made as funny a website as CheatNeutral.

Leave a Comment

 

February 16, 2007

Kiwi!

This is beautiful! It’s someone’s Masters thesis in animation. Watch Kiwi! on YouTube.

Thank you, Di, for the link.

Comments (6)

 

February 11, 2007

An enthusiasm for Cambridge photography


These photos were taken from my window on the first floor (the one above the ground floor) three days ago on Thursday. As you can see, it makes the previous snow day look like primary school homework.

Yesterday, Thara came to visit Cambridge. This was my second stint at being a tour guide. The first time, if you recall, was for Jana. Unfortunately for Thara, the weather was much worse this time around.

This is the Round Church, one of only four in England.

Ah, King’s College. I’ve almost over-photographed it, although you’ve only seen it before on this blog at night time during fog. It wasn’t really this sunny today. I’ve doctored the sky. You just can’t trust me anymore.

The Amnesty International candle is always alight in King’s College Chapel.

When Thara and I came out of King’s, we heard lots of chanting. For a university town, Cambridge doesn’t get as many demonstrations as you might expect. This was the first one I ever saw. What did the protesters want? Divestment of university funds from companies involved in the manufacture of weapons. When did they want it? Now.

The fuzzy black at the edges of the photo were metal fence bars, between which I had to stick my camera lens. The protesters were in front of Senate House, where I will hopefully be graduating after October this year.

We visited Clare College and ran into this gentlemen, who kindly agreed to be photographed. I asked him why he was wearing a kilt. He said that he was coming back from a night at a themed party. It was 1:30 PM when we met him. Must have been a good party.


This is Clare Bridge in Clare College. The first time I saw these bridge balls was on my computer in Melbourne — See Sean McHugh’s gallery. Sean makes use of HDR.


Here’s Thara taking pictures on Clare Bridge.

I would like your help, blog readers. I have two versions of this picture of the Mathematical Bridge. The legend of the bridge is well-known. Supposedly, Isaac Newton designed and built it so that it did not need any bolts or joins. Some curious students took it apart to see how it worked and couldn’t put it back together again. The only way was to bolt it together.

It isn’t true, of course. The bridge was designed by William Ethridge (some guy). I have been told, though, that the bridge members are arranged so that they are in compression (like an arch or vault) and the bridge can support its own weight without bolts. However, the bridge does have bolts to prevent collapse due to shear forces like wind.

Could you tell me if you prefer the closely cropped version of this picture or the original wide angle?

Comments (7)

 

February 9, 2007

My reward

I was walking home with a bag full of groceries from Sainsbury’s. I was in a good mood.

‘Scuze me,’ came a voice.

‘Hmm?’ I said, slowly pulling myself out of my pondering. I focused on a young man dressed in a grey hooded jumper.

‘Sorry to bother you, but do you have [mumble] [mumble]…’

‘Pardon?’ I was still thinking too slowly to interact with a real person.

‘Do you have 97 pence? You see, I need to buy a bus ticket.’ He ducked his head down, waiting for rejection.

I was in a great mood. I put my shopping down and reached unzipped my backpack to get my wallet. Today, I could afford a pound.

‘Thank you!’ he said. ‘I’m sorry, ah, I have to ask for money for the bus…’

‘That’s all right,’ I replied. I looked in my coin compartment. There was no gold one pound coin. There was only copper two pence and one pence coins. ‘Oh, I don’t know if I have anything,’ I said, feeling truly sorry. I looked in the notes compartment and found only £20 notes. If I had a £5 note, I probably would have given it to him. I was in such a good mood.

‘No, no, that’s okay, whatever you have,’ he assured me.

‘I’m really sorry, this is all I’ve got, honestly.’ I gave him five pence in coins.

Although a tiny amount, he must have been warmed by my absent-minded glowing smile. ‘Thank you… What’s your name?’

‘I’m Joan. How about you?’

‘Daniel.’

He stuck his hand out. I reached forward and he shook my hand. Then he raised it up and kissed it.

‘Thank you. Have a good day!’ And he darted off.

Comments (2)